Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Working Hand In Hand: The Male Gaze and Patriarchy

     The male gaze is a symptom of the larger problem in society – the issue being the regression of education, the ability to read, and the ability to logically argue, all of which inevitably prevents the progress needed to be made in society in status quo. The male gaze is the way people see women through the perspective of men; women too view themselves through the perspective of the male. The male gaze is illustrated through paintings by the apparent nature of the female subject’s attention – where her existence is dedicated towards his pleasure. In John Berger’s book titled Ways of Seeing, he defines and illustrates the male gaze. He writes,     “[s]he has to survey everything she is and everything she does because of how she appears to others, and ultimately how she appears to men, is of crucial importance for what is normally thought of as the success of her life” (Berger 46). The male gaze and the value of women being contingent on how attractive she appears to men is pervasive in art and popular culture.

The image above is an ad for the fragrance Jimmy Choo
Man. Although this fragrance is intended for men, the
editors of this image felt the need to include the bottom
of what may be presumed to be a female with heels on. 
     The male gaze translates to daily life in the form of hair-free arms to smooth legs. Some women feel the need to remove their natural bodily hair so that they may feel feminine, and be more likely attract someone. The pitfall of this logic is that pubescent girls are the ones who lack body hair; grown females who are able to carry a child have biologically evolved to have hair on their bodies for whatever significant purpose the hair serves. To think that man would want a female whose body resembles that of pubescent female is odd and alarming. Yet some women feel the need to still make sure they are hairless everywhere below the neck because of the fear of the repercussion of rejecting what society has come to consider feminine and attractive. When some females choose not to get rid of their bodily hair, their first critique most likely happens to be from other females; the second group of people to critique this rejection would be men who would not hold the same standards for themselves. 

     The male gaze plays well into the commandments of patriarchy, which is a political social system that dictates the gender norms in which the man holds the power and the woman is his aid. According to the prominent feminist bell hooks, “[p]atriarchy is a political-social system that insists that males are inherently dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak, especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and to rule over the weak and to maintain that dominance through various forms of psychological terrorism and violence” (hooks 18). In this system, the dominant man is not allowed to cry or express emotions – both of which are natural and should be permissible. In this system, a woman cannot be the boss because her hormones would not let her think logically – yet the science behind this claim is misconstrued because men also have their own cycle where their estrogen levels as well as their follicle stimulating hormone and their luteinizing hormones rise and fall throughout the month.

The overwhelming presence of skin-lightening
ad in India in hopes of better future despite majority
of population having a tan complexion. 
     Patriarchy extends to the East hemisphere as exemplified by the well-known cosmetic brand as “Fair and Lovely” who sends out the message that “lighter(skin) is better” and that if a female wants success in her life, she should use their facial cream to make herself lighter. These “success” cases run from finding a husband to landing a dream job. The woman’s skills, quality, personality, character, and ability are less significant compared to her looks. Such illogical advertisements would not have been an issue if public did not buy into their message, but the reality is far from that. When time comes for matrimony, the girl’s skin color is still considered a great factor right before her cooking skills, especially for families from the rural areas; individuals from such areas have less access to education and tend to be more engrained within the societal system which has been established for them. Girls feel the need to lighten their skin to attract a suitor (who he himself may have darker skin color than her even though there is starting to be a market for them as well). In cases like this, the male gaze and patriarchy work hand in hand. Ignorance fuels the continuation of the patriarchy and the male gaze, and the refusal to attempt to understand someone’s perspective is contingent within our society today despite the widespread access to education and knowledge.

Sources:
Berger, John. Ways of Seeing; a Book Made by John Berger. British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books, 1972.
hooks, bell. The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. Simon & Schuster, 2005.

By Maisha Manzoor

No comments:

Post a Comment